The radical homosexual agenda and the threat to religious liberty
- May 27, 2009 - 6
WASHINGTON—People of faith are on a collision course with the radical homosexual agenda. It is inevitable. In order for the radical homosexual agenda to be fully implemented, people of faith are going to have to be silenced and marginalized. The radical homosexual community will have to violate our religious liberty and our consciences in order to achieve this.
At this very moment, three issues move us closer to what I believe is an eventual clash. These issues affect our religious liberty in unique and distressing ways. I will mention two related to each.
‘Same-Sex Marriage’
First, “same-sex marriage” will lead to the violation of our children’s consciences. Many of us send our children to government-run schools armed with our convictions and the Bible’s teachings about homosexuality. Yet our children are already getting a much different message in some of them. Imagine what will happen if the government feels compelled to indoctrinate our children about the new civil right of “same-sex marriage.” We can expect government to look for ways to achieve this. The “struggle for same-sex marriage” will be detailed as a civil rights triumph in their history and civics textbooks. Our children will be exposed to speakers who will “help” them understand and accept “same-sex marriage.” Doubtless, many more insidious means will be deployed to indoctrinate our children and undermine their faith convictions about homosexuality.
Second, our freedom to choose our associations based on our religious convictions will be trampled. Legalization of “same-sex marriage” will create a situation in which the government will prohibit religious groups from using convictions about homosexuality as a determining factor in membership. This will extend to our participation in activities and access to religiously based accommodations, like church camps or retreats. What we have been seeing on this front lately is just the beginning. Imagine if we get to the place where “same-sex marriage” is treated as a civil right and all of the power of the United States government is brought to bear on making sure that no one involved in a “same-sex marriage” has his or her civil rights violated. It will not be possible for the government to secure the civil rights of those who are in a “homosexual marriage” and simultaneously accommodate our religiously held beliefs about homosexuality.
Employment Protections
The Employment Non-discrimination Act (ENDA) is a perfect example of the coming conflict. This bill is alive today in Congress and it threatens religious liberty. First of all, our ability to hire people who share our values will be taken away. A version of this bill provides an exemption for religious groups but not all of their religious activities. The provision defines what is to be considered an exempt religious activity. So a church may be exempted from the requirement to extend employment to homosexuals, but this same exemption will not be available to other faith-based activities, like bookstores, daycare centers or retreats. ENDA will prevent churches from applying their faith convictions about homosexuality to all of their hiring decisions.
Second, our faith will lead to accusations of discrimination in the workplace. These non-discrimination laws will treat as bigots all who communicate any kind of negative conviction about homosexuality in the workplace. Part of the current bill reads: “It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer to adversely affect the status of the individual as an employee because of such individual’s actual or perceived sexual orientation.” This language is so broad in its scope that a homosexual would have legal grounds to sue an employer who keeps a Bible on his desk. He can simply argue that by displaying a Bible, the employer is publicly identifying with its condemnation of homosexual behavior and thereby “adversely affecting” his status as an employee.
Hate Crimes
Hate crimes bills also threaten our religious liberty. First, our faith conviction about homosexuality could lead to federal prosecution for hate crimes. Under hate crimes statutes a Christian who happens to engage in an act of violence against a homosexual could be charged with a hate crime simply because he believes the Bible’s teachings about homosexuality, regardless of whether that has anything to do with the crime. No one should engage in acts of violence against a homosexual simply because he is a homosexual. But neither should someone’s religiously held beliefs about homosexuality be the cause of his prosecution.
Second, hate crimes legislation could have a chilling effect on religious speech that is critical of homosexuality. A precedent already exists. Today some pastors are reluctant to speak about political issues because they fear the loss of their tax exempt status. To assure compliance with the law, they even shy away from political speech that is still permissible. We can expect a similar response from some pastors if they begin to fear being charged with a hate crime for potentially inciting violence against homosexuals through their preaching or teaching or if they fear endangering their tax exempt status.
These are all serious issues. They must be addressed. Our faith and the radical homosexual agenda are on track for a cataclysmic conflict. If the radical homosexual agenda is codified into law, our own government will be arrayed against us and our struggle to protect our religious freedom. We can fight this battle now or we can fight it later, but we are going to fight this battle. We must stand up and protect our freedom to believe and to practice our faith according to God’s leading, not governments’.
The Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission works to preserve religious liberty in America and across the world. If you would like to help us continue our fight to protect this freedom, please click here.
Further Learning
Learn more about: Family, Sexual Purity, Homosexuality, Citizenship, Religious Liberty
Comments are closed. Please use our contact form if you have any thoughts or questions.
comments
1 On May 31st, 2009, at 10:18am, Dan Valdes wrote:
This so called “radical homosexual agenda” has been picked up by none other than Mr. Ted Olsen, former solicitor general for George W Bush and member of the Federalist Society.
As quoted in the New York Times article, Olson said, “If you look into the eyes and hearts of people who are gay and talk to them about this issue, that reinforces in the most powerful way possible the fact that these individuals deserve to be treated equally.”
Olson indicated that in his view the case was a natural for the U.S. Supreme Court, which makes decisions about constitutional law. “Creating a second class of citizens is discrimination, plain and simple,” Olson explained.
I continue to be dumbfounded by Dr. Duke’s continued hyperbole and deception on these issues of fundamental fairness and equality.
2 On May 31st, 2009, at 7:17pm, Dr. David L. Shelley wrote:
This battle, that Dr. Duke warns about, is happening in Memphis, TN, right now. The Shelby County Commission will vote June 1 on an ordinance to prohibit discrimination against “sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression” in hiring and promotion. If passed, this will be the first major city in the state to establish those who practice these homosexual behaviors as a protected class, and it will burden the religious freedom of county employees.
3 On Jun 1st, 2009, at 8:32pm, Dan Valdes wrote:
June 1, 2009
“NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim June 2009 as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Pride Month. I call upon the people of the United States to turn back discrimination and prejudice everywhere it exists.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this first day of June, in the year of our Lord two thousand nine, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-third.
BARACK OBAMA ”
4 On Jun 2nd, 2009, at 6:48am, Dan Valdes wrote:
Ted Olsen says of the new federal lawsuit for marriage equality….
(or as Dr. Duke calls it, the “radical homosexual agenda”)
“We’re going to court because people shouldn’t have to surrender their fundamental rights to a popular plebiscite.”
“People should not have to beg to be treated equally or wait for decades for popular approval to be treated equally.”
What is so radical about fairness and equality?
5 On Jun 5th, 2009, at 6:24am, Dan Valdes wrote:
Please forgive my ignorance, I have misspelled Mr. Ted Olson name in all of my previous posts.
6 On Jun 6th, 2009, at 8:56pm, Cherly wrote:
Our inherent rights to Equality and Religious Liberty both come from “Nature and Nature’s God.” Given that, there is no reason for there to be a conflict between the two. The conflict comes in because same-sex marriage is NOT an Equality issue. Every man and woman has an equal opportunity to marry - a person of the opposite sex. THAT is the inherent right. We are made male OR female.
The latest research into homosexuality is showing that the proclivity towards same-sex attraction can be overcome through counseling. The APA itself has withdrawn the “gay gene” claim, and it appears homosexuals aren’t “born that way”.
Seems to me we should be reviewing the implications for Liberties of All before galloping down the slippery slope.