Time Shortens on Agreement on Judges

By Doug Carlson - Apr 29, 2008 - comment

Just as April showers bring May flowers, a pledge by the Senate’s top leader earlier this month could bring the confirmation of three judges by the end of May.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), pressured by Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and others, showed signs two weeks ago that the storm clouds over an impasse on judicial nominees might soon pass as he made a good-faith commitment to allow votes on three circuit court nominees by Memorial Day. However, little movement has since been made on the pledge. Sen. Reid and close ally Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT)—who chairs the Judiciary Committee, which must report nominees to the full Senate for a vote—have been the chief rainmakers delaying action on President Bush’s nominees.

It should come as no surprise that many commentators deem the federal judiciary as broken, considering the long list of vacancies on courts throughout the nation and the Senate’s sluggish response to repair this ailing branch.

Richard Land, president of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, sent an action alert yesterday asking people to urge Sens. Reid and Leahy to “move swiftly on—and go beyond—the commitment to give three circuit court nominees fair, up-or-down votes.”

Land highlighted the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals as one court in particular whose vacancies have been declared judicial emergencies. Vacancies now double the number of judges serving on the 15-seat court with jurisdiction over Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, and the Carolinas. This is an injustice to the overburdened judges serving and to the American people, who deserve a judiciary that functions at full strength.

These understaffed courts are increasingly handing down decisions on marriage and family that bear real impact on Christians. Just two months ago, a California appeals court ruled that parents without teaching credentials cannot home-school their children. While the court has since decided to reconsider the case, other troubling decisions are likely on the horizon.

The Senate has confirmed just seven judges to federal circuit courts of appeals since the chamber switched party hands and Sen. Reid took the reins as majority leader in January 2007. That number is dismally low by almost any standard, especially since there are 11 pending nominations to fill appeals-court vacancies. Several of these nominations have languished for years.

Sen. Reid’s olive branch on judicial confirmations would barely put the Senate on par with the average number of nominees confirmed during the final two years of a presidency when another party controlled the Senate.

Several senators who are applying pressure for movement on judicial nominees have a short list that they believe should be given top priority. All nine Republican committee members joined in a letter last week calling on Chairman Leahy to hold votes on Robert Conrad and Steve Matthews, both nominated to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, and Peter Keisler, a former acting attorney general who has been nominated to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. Well credentialed and supported by their home-state senators, Conrad and Matthews have been awaiting a committee vote for the better part of a year. Keisler, given a “unanimously well-qualified” rating by the American Bar Association, has been waiting for more than a year.

Senators and White House administrations come and go, but federal judges are appointed to their positions for life. That makes it all the more important to have judges on our benches who interpret the Constitution according to its intended meaning, not through the lens of modern public opinion or the shifting culture. Still, every nominee—qualified or unqualified, strict-constructionist or “open-minded”—should be given the courtesy of an up-or-down vote.

If you believe Sens. Reid and Leahy should uphold their commitment to vote to confirm three circuit court nominees by Memorial Day, as well as exceed this minimum commitment for the well-being of our courts and our nation, please call them at the numbers below or send them an e-mail if you live in Nevada or Vermont.

Sen. Harry Reid, Majority Leader
(202) 224-5556

Sen. Patrick Leahy, Chairman, Judiciary Committee
(202) 224-4242

Further Learning

Learn more about: Citizenship, , Legislation

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com