U.N. panel OKs call for ban on human cloning

By Tom Strode - Feb 28, 2005 - comment

The United Nations’ legal committee passed Feb. 18 a resolution calling on all countries to enact comprehensive bans on human cloning.

The panel voted 71-35, with 43 abstentions, to urge U.N. members to “prohibit all forms of human cloning inasmuch as they are incompatible with human dignity and the protection of human life.” The recommendation will go to the U.N.’s General Assembly for consideration.

The declaration is nonbinding and fell short of a treaty supported by the United States and more than 60 allies that would have mandated a ban on cloning for both reproductive and research purposes. While U.N. members are united in supporting a prohibition on reproductive cloning, some countries oppose a ban on research cloning, which results in the destruction of embryos.

“It’s an important first step in the right direction in raising the awareness of the conscience of the world that this is a dangerous scientific practice that must face worldwide condemnation,” said Richard Land, president of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission.

Great Britain and Belgium, leaders of the opposition to the resolution, said it would not affect their policies in support of research cloning.

The U.N. has been embroiled in a three-year battle over a cloning ban, with Costa Rica leading a pro-comprehensive ban contingent that outnumbered its foes by three to one. In November, however, the legal committee agreed to consider a nonbinding resolution in February after the impasse on a binding treaty could not be overcome.

Proponents of research cloning defend its legalization primarily for the purpose of extracting stem cells from embryos, which are destroyed in the process.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Life, Cloning

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com