‘Unfairness’ Doctrine Down but Not Out

By Doug Carlson - Jun 24, 2008 - comment

From newspapers to news magazines to broadcast and cable television, the liberal bias reigns supreme. Talk radio has largely filled this void as the only medium for news that offers a heavier dose of conservative viewpoints. But without an act of Congress, conservative radio voices could soon be muzzled if not driven off the air altogether.

For nearly four decades, a policy deceptively titled the Fairness Doctrine required broadcasters to balance airtime with opposing viewpoints on “controversial issues of public importance.” The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1974 and 1985 that the policy curtailed free speech, and the Reagan administration rightly repealed it in 1987. Now liberals threaten to bring it back.

If you value the First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and religion and believe the American people, not the government, should determine what types of issues are broadcast on the airwaves, please ask your congressman if he has signed Rep. Pence’s discharge petition on the Broadcaster Freedom Act (H.R. 2905) and urge him to do so if he has not already.

A radio talk show host turned U.S. congressman is urging his colleagues to support legislation to prevent the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from reviving the policy. But one year after Rep. Mike Pence (R-IN) introduced the Broadcaster Freedom Act (H.R. 2905), the Democratic leadership has refused to bring it to the floor for a vote.

Undeterred, Rep. Pence is navigating his bill through another channel. He is asking his colleagues to sign onto a discharge petition that would force a vote on the bill if it attracts 218 House signatories, or a simple majority. His petition currently has 195 signatories, 23 short of the key number.

The congressman took first steps last summer toward sealing the casket of the Fairness Doctrine by introducing an amendment to place a one-year ban on the policy. The amendment passed with an impressive 309 votes; Republican support was universal, with 113 Democrats adding to the tally.

Yet none of the Democrats who supported the moratorium has added his name to the Broadcaster Freedom Act. The pressure not to do so is, apparently, coming from the top in the House and Senate. According to Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL), “It’s time to reinstitute the Fairness Doctrine,” and Sen. Diane Feinstein (D-CA) has said she is “looking at” reviving the policy.

When the Fairness Doctrine was put in place in 1949, a case could be made for the need to give equal time to perspectives on hot-button issues in the media. Radio was limited to only a few stations, television consisted of the Big Three—ABC, CBS, and NBC—and the Internet had not yet been conceived. But more than a half-century later, there is no shortage of sources for news.

Now there is nothing fair about the Fairness Doctrine. It is simply another attempt to erode the First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and freedom of religion. In addition to muzzling conservative radio heavyweights like Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity, the policy could deny airtime to many Christian radio programs simply for addressing issues from a biblical perspective such as the sanctity of human life and God’s design for marriage. The three-hour live call-in radio program Richard Land Live! hosted Saturdays by the ERLC’s president, is one such program that would not be safe from the reach of the Fairness Doctrine.

Regulation of political thought on the airwaves today would be a giant step toward stifling free speech not ensuring its protection. It is time, as Rep. Pence has stated, to “send the Fairness Doctrine to the ash heap of broadcast history.”

If you value the First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and religion and believe the American people, not the government, should determine what types of issues are broadcast on the airwaves, please ask your congressman if he has signed Rep. Pence’s discharge petition on the Broadcaster Freedom Act (H.R. 2905) and urge him to do so if he has not already.

The Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission works to monitor issues of public policy in America, such as the Fairness Doctrine. If you would like to help us continue our efforts, please click here.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Citizenship, Christian Citizenship, Legislation, National, Religious Liberty

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com