Vote on marriage amendment expected Sept. 30

By Tom Strode - Sep 1, 2004 - comment

The House of Representatives is expected to vote Sept. 30 on a constitutional amendment to protect marriage.

The Federal Marriage Amendment, H.J. Res. 56, would define marriage as only between a man and a woman. It also is designed to block courts from legalizing homosexual “marriage.”

As with other federal amendments, it will require a two-thirds majority, or 290 votes, to gain approval in the House. The Senate turned back an attempt to pass such an amendment in July, when senators voted 50-48 against invoking cloture, thereby blocking a direct vote on the measure. A cloture vote requires agreement from 60 senators to end a filibuster.

Two recent rulings in the state of Washington lent credence to the arguments of amendment supporters that state laws are inadequate in protecting marriage. State judges ruled in August and September that Washington’s Defense of Marriage Act violated the state constitution. No court in the United States had struck down such a state law prior to the rulings.

You may inform your representative of your position on H.J. Res. 56 by calling the U.S. Capitol switchboard, (202) 225-3121, and asking for his or her office.

A massive rally in support of marriage is scheduled Oct. 15 on the National Mall in Washington, D.C. Among the “Mayday for Marriage” rally speakers will be Richard Land, president of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission; James Dobson, chairman of Focus on the Family; Chuck Colson, chairman of Prison Fellowship Ministries, and Tony Perkins, president of Family Research Council.

Voters in two states recently approved amendments to protect marriage. In August, Missouri voters passed an amendment to the state constitution with a 71 percent majority. On Sept. 18, Louisiana voters approved an amendment banning both homosexual “marriage” and civil unions with a 78 percent majority.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Family, Marriage, Sexual Purity, Homosexuality, Citizenship, Legislation

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com