‘Wedding’ bells ring off key in nation’s Heartland

By Richard Land
Apr 8, 2009

Iowa is now the poster child for why it is important to have constitutional amendments that decree that marriage is only between one man and one woman.

It has been my contention for some time that each state needs to have in place a constitutional amendment defining marriage as only between one man and one woman. Without such an amendment, a state’s activist Supreme Court can overturn a law adopted by the legislature, declaring it to be unconstitutional. That is what happened in Iowa and Massachusetts. In passing Proposition 8 in referendum last November, voters reversed a similar move by the California Supreme Court the previous June.

The April 3 decision propelled Iowa to the forefront of our nation’s same-sex “marriage” debate when the state’s highest court ruled the state’s ban on same-sex “marriage” violated the equal protection clause of the Iowa Constitution. Iowa joins Connecticut, Massachusetts and Vermont in permitting marriages between homosexual and lesbian couples.

Once again, it was the judiciary branch of state government rending the nation’s moral fabric, bent on rewriting our country’s social construct.

With no residency requirements, the court’s opinion means at the end of April when the order goes into effect, same-sex couples will be free to travel from other states to exchange “vows” in the Iowa Heartland.

This ruling turns Iowa into a destination for same-sex “marriages.” No doubt there are weekend travel packages already being planned. Iowa will soon be the Las Vegas of same-sex “marriage” for America. And you know those folks won’t be resettling in the Hawkeye State, but will be heading back home–perhaps to your state.

And given there is no provision for citizen-initiated constitutional referendums in Iowa, it will take at least two years for proponents of traditional marriage–if successful–to get a ban on same-sex “marriage” in the state’s constitution.

The Iowa Senate Majority Leader Michael Gronstal promised he would block any legislation codifying a ban on same-sex “marriage” in the state’s constitution, saying he doesn’t see anything wrong with a “bunch of people who merely want to profess their love for each other.”

The only way to stop another state’s judges from trumping the people’s elected representatives is to pass an amendment to that state’s constitution. Over 20 states have already done this and are at least protected from the overreach of their state’s Supreme Court.

The Iowa Supreme Court couldn’t have ruled that an amendment to the constitution is “unconstitutional.” If they had done that, then a government “of the people, by the people, for the people” would be imperiled. If the California Supreme Court does this in the case they are currently considering, then we’d have to say that our entire system of government is coming to a tragic end.

The Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission works to preserve the institution of marriage. To learn more about these important issues, additional resources are available here. If your church is interested in purchasing bulletin inserts or other materials on marriage and family, please visit our online bookstore.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Family, Marriage, Sexual Purity, Homosexuality,

You May Also Like

Pornography, America’s next moral battleground?

By Richard Land - Jun 11, 2012

A newly released Gallup poll taking America’s moral temperature finds strong support for fidelity in marriage and increasing respect for unborn life, but in other key areas — specifically sex outside of marriage and homosexuality — Americans may have lost their biblical compass.…

Read More

Hostility to religion in U.S. at ‘all-time high’

By Tom Strode - Aug 27, 2012

Hostility toward religious expression “has reached an all-time high” in the United States, according to a new report.

“The Survey of Religious Hostility in America” shows a rising tide of attacks on religious liberty in the public square and in schools as well as against churches and ministries, Liberty Institute (LI) and Family Research Council (FRC) said in the 140-page report.…

Read More

VIDEO: Teaching children godly sexuality

By Thomas Willis - May 2, 2014

Dennis Rainey, president and CEO of FamilyLife, and Bob Lepine, senior vice president of FamilyLife, give advise on instructing children on the correct view of sexuality.

“Think about who you learned about sexuality from and ask yourself if that’s who you want your children to hear about it from too.…

Read More

LIFE DIGEST: Christie vetoes surrogacy bill

By Tom Strode - Aug 14, 2012

Both pro-life and pro-choice advocates applauded Gov. Chris Christie’s Aug. 8 veto of legislation that would have made New Jersey one of the few states to authorize gestational surrogacy.

Gestational surrogacy involves a woman carrying and giving birth for a couple to a child produced by in vitro fertilization.…

Read More
Smoke clears after House tobacco vote Spouses sometimes find themselves as caregivers