‘Wedding’ bells ring off key in nation’s Heartland

By Richard Land
Apr 8, 2009

Iowa is now the poster child for why it is important to have constitutional amendments that decree that marriage is only between one man and one woman.

It has been my contention for some time that each state needs to have in place a constitutional amendment defining marriage as only between one man and one woman. Without such an amendment, a state’s activist Supreme Court can overturn a law adopted by the legislature, declaring it to be unconstitutional. That is what happened in Iowa and Massachusetts. In passing Proposition 8 in referendum last November, voters reversed a similar move by the California Supreme Court the previous June.

The April 3 decision propelled Iowa to the forefront of our nation’s same-sex “marriage” debate when the state’s highest court ruled the state’s ban on same-sex “marriage” violated the equal protection clause of the Iowa Constitution. Iowa joins Connecticut, Massachusetts and Vermont in permitting marriages between homosexual and lesbian couples.

Once again, it was the judiciary branch of state government rending the nation’s moral fabric, bent on rewriting our country’s social construct.

With no residency requirements, the court’s opinion means at the end of April when the order goes into effect, same-sex couples will be free to travel from other states to exchange “vows” in the Iowa Heartland.

This ruling turns Iowa into a destination for same-sex “marriages.” No doubt there are weekend travel packages already being planned. Iowa will soon be the Las Vegas of same-sex “marriage” for America. And you know those folks won’t be resettling in the Hawkeye State, but will be heading back home–perhaps to your state.

And given there is no provision for citizen-initiated constitutional referendums in Iowa, it will take at least two years for proponents of traditional marriage–if successful–to get a ban on same-sex “marriage” in the state’s constitution.

The Iowa Senate Majority Leader Michael Gronstal promised he would block any legislation codifying a ban on same-sex “marriage” in the state’s constitution, saying he doesn’t see anything wrong with a “bunch of people who merely want to profess their love for each other.”

The only way to stop another state’s judges from trumping the people’s elected representatives is to pass an amendment to that state’s constitution. Over 20 states have already done this and are at least protected from the overreach of their state’s Supreme Court.

The Iowa Supreme Court couldn’t have ruled that an amendment to the constitution is “unconstitutional.” If they had done that, then a government “of the people, by the people, for the people” would be imperiled. If the California Supreme Court does this in the case they are currently considering, then we’d have to say that our entire system of government is coming to a tragic end.

The Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission works to preserve the institution of marriage. To learn more about these important issues, additional resources are available here. If your church is interested in purchasing bulletin inserts or other materials on marriage and family, please visit our online bookstore.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Family, Marriage, Sexual Purity, Homosexuality,

You May Also Like

House to Vote Tuesday on D.C. Unborn Child Pain Bill

By Richard Land - Jul 30, 2012

The U.S. House of Representatives is scheduled to vote this week on legislation to end unrestricted abortion in the nation’s capital.

According to House leadership, the House will vote Tuesday on the District of Columbia Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act (H.R.

Read More

Gambling and the Internet

By Barrett Duke - May 4, 2012

In 2006, the ERLC was part of a broad coalition that helped pass the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act. This law was deemed so powerful that many Internet gambling companies saw their stock values plunge almost immediately after the bill was signed into law.…

Read More

Ending the modern day slavery of sex trafficking

By Barrett Duke - Aug 22, 2012

Recently, a woman knocked on the front door of our suburban middle-class home and asked if the young toddler in diapers she had found wandering the neighborhood was ours. Needless to say, we were as shocked as this distressed woman that a toddler could go wandering the streets of our neighborhood.…

Read More

48 Chinese Christians detained New Year’s Day

By Staff - Jan 4, 2012

Beijing authorities detained 48 members of a large persecuted house church on New Year’s Day, marking a total of more than 1,000 church members who have been taken into police custody during the church’s 38 weeks of attempting to hold outdoor worship services.…

Read More
Smoke clears after House tobacco vote Spouses sometimes find themselves as caregivers