Wiping out environmental woes

By Dwayne Hastings - Apr 25, 2007 - 2

Toilet Paper

Singer and environmental activist Sheryl Crow—in her quest to save the planet—has now decided the fate of the globe might hang on toilet paper. Perhaps that is overstating her view, but Crow recently lamented the amount of toilet tissue Americans use.

“I propose a limitation be put on how many squares of toilet paper can be used in any one sitting,” Crowe said, suggesting Americans are “industrious enough” to use just one square per bathroom seating.

Her beef with toilet paper is that the trees needed to make the tissue take in carbon dioxide and give off oxygen. (By the way, most grocery stores carry at least one brand of “recycled” toilet paper.)

According to press reports, Crow—who was also in the news this weekend after accosting presidential advisor Karl Rove at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner—also took aim at paper napkins as the “height of wastefulness.” To those similarly offended by paper napkins, Crow has a clothing line that includes a detachable “dining sleeve.” Anything to save Mother Earth, we suppose.

Whether Crow was joking about the toilet paper rationing or not, her two-week “Global Warming Tour” to colleges ended in style on Earth Day 2007.

The first Earth Day—established in 1969 by Sen. Gaylord Nelson (D-Wis.)—was a response to an increasing awareness of oil spills, polluting factories and power plants, toxic waste dumps, and heavy use of pesticides in the nation.

Gaylord said he wanted “to shake up the political establishment and force [these issues] onto the national agenda.” Many believe Congress’s passage of the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act and the Endangered Species Act was prompted by the outcry channeled by Earth Day’s focus on environmental issues.

In a stop at the University of Alabama at Birmingham during her tour, Crow said, “I feel this is the most important Earth Day that will take place in our lives.” She said the date marked a “real turning point.”

Crow said the issue is “dire” and that “it should be above all other issues.” Her tour mate, activist Laurie David, predicted the 2008 presidential election would focus on three issues: jobs, terrorism and temperature.

With concern over global warming reaching a feverish pitch, particularly among younger Americans, the ERLC’s Richard Land offered a timely warning.

“God holds us accountable for our stewardship of the creation,” said Land, president of the SBC’s entity for moral and public policy issues.

“We have a responsibility to inform our young people of both the problems and of the biblical principles that should inform our response. In doing so, we can further perform our duties as Christians and parents by inoculating them against the false, anti-biblical teaching that so heavily suffuses so much of the modern, secular environmental movement,” he continued.

“The Bible’s strong teaching of human preeminence and dominion in the created order is balanced by God’s instructions to carefully manage land and animals, Land said. “As stewards of His property, we are responsible to develop it and bring forth its fruit and increase, but to not desecrate or dissipate it.”

If Crow’s tour has done nothing else, your next visit to the bathroom might include some reflection on the size of your “carbon footprint.” More on that in next week’s FFV.

Lucretia Goddard contributed to this report.

Further Learning

Learn more about: Citizenship, Science, Environment

2 comments (post your own) feed

1 On Apr 26th, 2007, at 10:29am, kathy wrote:

I wish as Christians we’d be careful not to put out “scandoulous/untruthful” headlines about a topic just to get people to read it.  The author of the article should have done her research and saw that the whole use a square was a joke from the beginning. It was an off the cuff remark made by Mrs. David, stemming from an episode of Seinfeld that her husband had written about using only a square of toliet paper. It was never intended to be an statement of how she or Ms. Crow wanted us to cut back. Ms. Crow’s original comment was that we needed to cut back on our use of paper goods. I know the secular media ran with the story but I would like to think we could expect more from a christian article.  I just think you missed the mark for behaving like a christian and not leading people astray through subterfuge. Lying is lying as my mother used to say even if all you do is lead someone to believe an untruth.

2 On Apr 26th, 2007, at 3:47pm, steve wrote:

Hey Kathy - lighten up. The author was simply trying to be humorous. Personally I didn’t find the stuff about Sheryl Crow that funny (I’ve never been a fan of lavatory humor) but you’ve got to admit the quotes accredited to Richard Land were hilarious.

Post a Comment




Notify me of follow-up comments?

Before You Submit Your Comment (below), Read This:

Thank you for your interest in the ministry of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (SBC).

Comments are moderated to preserve the family-oriented nature of this website and in an attempt to avoid comment spam. We welcome opposing viewpoints, and we will not turn comments away as long as your views are presented with respect to everyone.

Your comments will not appear immediately and are subject to editing or deletion. We will make every attempt to check new comments in a timely manner, though there will likely be delays on the weekends and around holidays.

Please follow the these guidelines to insure your comments will be posted:

  1. Use a real name, at least a real first name. We find folks are less-rude online when not hiding behind a screen-name.
  2. Name-calling and vulgar-language will not be tolerated. Zero-tolerance is our policy. We will not spend time editing profanity. If it contains foul language, your post will be deleted. Oh, and we decide what is and what is not vulgar.
  3. Comments must be on topic. General comments (compliments, complaints, and otherwise) are best delivered here or expressed on your own personal Web site.
  4. And please, do not type in ALL CAPS. It looks like you're screaming at people.

Additionally, within Baptist polity, please recognize that many issues and decisions are addressed at a local church level. SBC denominational (national) offices have no control and desire no control over the activities of a local church. This entity is not responsible for overseeing and insuring the ethical behavior of Southern Baptist pastors or church members. If your concern involves a legal civil or criminal matter, we suggest you contact the proper local officials.

Issues involving pastoral staff or other church members, local Baptist associations or state Baptist conventions are local issues. Therefore the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission cannot and should not address such issues. While we regret we are unable to assist you, we encourage you to seek a biblical resolution of the issue at the local church level. If your question or submission pertains to a matter covered in this text, it is likely we will not acknowledge your submission.

Other than that, we welcome you and hope to see thoughtful discussions at ERLC.com