Recent Comments
On The Second Amendment, guns, and the Supreme Court
I find it incredible that four justices, who obviously have an agenda, because how can anybody with a lick of common sense can not understand “The right of the people to keep and bear arms will not be infringed.” I can only conclude that they do not care what the constitution says. more »
By Mike - Jul 8, 2008
On LIFE DIGEST: House drops provision to benefit Planned Parenthood
Dear Mr. Enlow,
The Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission strongly supports defunding Planned Parenthood. In fact, messengers to the Southern Baptist Convention’s annual meeting last month approved a resolution calling on Congress to defund the abortion provider. more »
By Doug Carlson - Jul 8, 2008
On The Second Amendment, guns, and the Supreme Court
I couldn’t agree more with Charles’s comments above. Well said. What worries me is the lack of moral consensus in our culture which guided the original framers of our constitution and our laws. more »
By Daniel Wallace - Jul 8, 2008
On The Second Amendment, guns, and the Supreme Court
You state:
“...no government entity—local, state, or federal—can totally ban handguns from law-abiding, local citizens.”
While I hope that this is the eventual result of Heller, it remains to be seen whether this finding will apply to any entity other than federal due to the courts patch-work approach to incorporation under the 14th amendment. more »
By Jerry Minor - Jul 8, 2008
On The face of marriage in America
Perhaps I cannot name names or your tax exemption would be scrutinized, but you must know that both ultra-liberal contestants for the presidential nomination of one of the parties, have advocated the removal of all barriers to the radical homosexual agenda. more »
By Charles Enlow - Jul 8, 2008
On The Second Amendment, guns, and the Supreme Court
Strict construction is the only way to view our Constitution. Either the document has a meaning commensurate with its grammar and the original intent of its framers - as expressed by them in their speeches, public and private papers - or it is the “living document\” that the liberals claim it is. more »
By Charles Enlow - Jul 8, 2008
On Abortion - Statistics
My question:
Why do democrats who by large numbers admit their number one political stance is that they must be given the right to kill children? more »
By JoeG - Jul 8, 2008
On It seems that HIV really 'is a gay disease'
This story is inaccurate. Mr. Foreman’s comments have not caused controversy within or “rattled” the lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender (LGBT) community. more »
By Roberta Sklar - Jul 7, 2008
On Iraq: When Will Progress Be Acknowledged As Significant?
RE: Doug
You are wrong if you think the families of the soldiers who gave their lives in Iraq do not see this progress as a great thing. Their loved ones did not die in vain. more »
By Teresa - Jul 5, 2008
On Court shakes California twice in three weeks
Just to include into our factual evidence for the spirit of debate, Representative Mark Leno from a San Francisco district twice introduced a bill into the state legislative in California that would allow “gender neutral” marriages between two people. more »
By David Asher - Jul 4, 2008