<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">

    <channel>


	<title>The Ethics &amp; Religious Liberty Commission | ENDA: Unacceptable to Religious and LGBT Groups? | Comments</title>
    <link>http://erlc.com/</link>
    <description>This feed provides all comments on &quot;ENDA: Unacceptable to Religious and LGBT Groups?.&quot;</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <webMaster>web&#45;master@erlc.com</webMaster>
    <copyright>&#x2117; &amp; &#xA9; 2009 ERLC</copyright> 


		
    <item>
      	<title>Comment 1</title>
      	<link>http://erlc.com/article/enda&#45;unacceptable&#45;to&#45;religious&#45;and&#45;lgbt&#45;groups#comment1</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://erlc.com/article/enda&#45;unacceptable&#45;to&#45;religious&#45;and&#45;lgbt&#45;groups#comment1</guid>
      	<description><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Carlson states.&#8220;Unlike current employment protections based on race, age, and gender, “sexual orientation” is behavioral&#8230;.</p>

<p>&#8221; but that is simply not true.&nbsp; What behavior?&nbsp; I am gay when I am sleeping, eating, drinking, working, etc&#8230;so what is he talking about?
</p>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 07:12:11 CST</pubDate>
    </item>

		
    <item>
      	<title>Comment 2</title>
      	<link>http://erlc.com/article/enda&#45;unacceptable&#45;to&#45;religious&#45;and&#45;lgbt&#45;groups#comment2</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://erlc.com/article/enda&#45;unacceptable&#45;to&#45;religious&#45;and&#45;lgbt&#45;groups#comment2</guid>
      	<description><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting twist! However, I could not agree more with the general evangelical stance against the ENDA bill, not just from a Christian viewpoint, but from a democratic view of the tyranny that would be imposed on the individual conscience!
</p>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 08:09:25 CST</pubDate>
    </item>

		
    <item>
      	<title>Comment 3</title>
      	<link>http://erlc.com/article/enda&#45;unacceptable&#45;to&#45;religious&#45;and&#45;lgbt&#45;groups#comment3</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://erlc.com/article/enda&#45;unacceptable&#45;to&#45;religious&#45;and&#45;lgbt&#45;groups#comment3</guid>
      	<description><![CDATA[<p>How would this bill affect the military?&nbsp; Especially the don&#8217;t ask don&#8217;t tell policy?
</p>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 10:52:12 CST</pubDate>
    </item>

		
    <item>
      	<title>Comment 4</title>
      	<link>http://erlc.com/article/enda&#45;unacceptable&#45;to&#45;religious&#45;and&#45;lgbt&#45;groups#comment4</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://erlc.com/article/enda&#45;unacceptable&#45;to&#45;religious&#45;and&#45;lgbt&#45;groups#comment4</guid>
      	<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear Richard,<br />
We must stand strong against this kind of manipulation. No other group has this kind of protection and neither should the gays. We must restore the fact that to our Holy God, homosexuality is an abomination and not a favored status. <br />
Keep up the great work. </p>

<p>Pastor Ike
</p>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 13:19:57 CST</pubDate>
    </item>

		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:59:55 CST</pubDate>
		
    <item>
      	<title>Comment 5</title>
      	<link>http://erlc.com/article/enda&#45;unacceptable&#45;to&#45;religious&#45;and&#45;lgbt&#45;groups#comment5</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://erlc.com/article/enda&#45;unacceptable&#45;to&#45;religious&#45;and&#45;lgbt&#45;groups#comment5</guid>
      	<description><![CDATA[<p>I am definitely opposed to this H.R. 3685. It has the potential of taking away religious freedom from employers. It could also be misinterpreted by pro-active judges which could lead to problems in private Christian Universities,ect.
</p>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:59:55 CST</pubDate>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>