<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">

    <channel>


	<title>The Ethics &amp; Religious Liberty Commission | Hooked by pornography | Comments</title>
    <link>http://erlc.com/</link>
    <description>This feed provides all comments on &quot;Hooked by pornography.&quot;</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <webMaster>web&#45;master@erlc.com</webMaster>
    <copyright>&#x2117; &amp; &#xA9; 2008 ERLC</copyright> 


		
    <item>
      	<title>Comment 1</title>
      	<link>http://erlc.com/article/hooked&#45;by&#45;pornography#comment1</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://erlc.com/article/hooked&#45;by&#45;pornography#comment1</guid>
      	<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for covering this subject. Keep up your good work.
</p>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 08:09:28 CST</pubDate>
    </item>

		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 11:49:04 CST</pubDate>
		
    <item>
      	<title>Comment 2</title>
      	<link>http://erlc.com/article/hooked&#45;by&#45;pornography#comment2</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://erlc.com/article/hooked&#45;by&#45;pornography#comment2</guid>
      	<description><![CDATA[<p>I have just discovered something better than a filter.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.seenoevil.com">http://www.seenoevil.com</a> actually blocks images, allowing me to gradually uncloak them for my children or myself.&nbsp; Accidental viewing of inappropriate images seems to be a bigger issue now.&nbsp; The pornographers keep finding ways around filters and using more benign web addresses.&nbsp; Just a thought.&nbsp; Filters don&#8217;t work at my house.
</p>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 11:49:04 CST</pubDate>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>