<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">

    <channel>


	<title>The Ethics &amp; Religious Liberty Commission | Land: Ruling will impair protection of Americans | Comments</title>
    <link>http://erlc.com/</link>
    <description>This feed provides all comments on &quot;Land: Ruling will impair protection of Americans.&quot;</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <webMaster>web&#45;master@erlc.com</webMaster>
    <copyright>&#x2117; &amp; &#xA9; 2008 ERLC</copyright> 


		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:49:05 CST</pubDate>
		
    <item>
      	<title>Comment 1</title>
      	<link>http://erlc.com/article/land&#45;ruling&#45;will&#45;impair&#45;protection&#45;of&#45;americans#comment1</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://erlc.com/article/land&#45;ruling&#45;will&#45;impair&#45;protection&#45;of&#45;americans#comment1</guid>
      	<description><![CDATA[<p>You make some valid points, and in general I tend to agree with many things that you say.&nbsp; I&#8217;m having a little trouble, though, understanding how this particular issue relates to &#8220;Ethics and Religious Liberty&#8221;.&nbsp; Is this an ethical, moral, or religious issue any more than, say, lumber tariff negotiations with Canada?&nbsp; It&#8217;s an important issue, to be sure; I just don&#8217;t see the rationale for the ERLC to be taking a public stand on it.&nbsp; I&#8217;m not trying to knock you down, just challenging you to stay on point.
</p>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:49:05 CST</pubDate>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>