<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">

    <channel>


	<title>The Ethics &amp; Religious Liberty Commission | The face of marriage in America | Comments</title>
    <link>http://erlc.com/</link>
    <description>This feed provides all comments on &quot;The face of marriage in America.&quot;</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <webMaster>web&#45;master@erlc.com</webMaster>
    <copyright>&#x2117; &amp; &#xA9; 2009 ERLC</copyright> 


		
    <item>
      	<title>Comment 1</title>
      	<link>http://erlc.com/article/the&#45;face&#45;of&#45;marriage&#45;in&#45;america#comment1</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://erlc.com/article/the&#45;face&#45;of&#45;marriage&#45;in&#45;america#comment1</guid>
      	<description><![CDATA[<p>Two United States Senators implicated in extramarital sexual activity have named themselves as co-sponsors of S. J. RES. 43, dubbed the Marriage Protection Amendment. </p>

<p>If ratified, the bill would amend the United States Constitution to state that marriage &#8220;shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman.&#8221; so on that front I would assuredly agree with Mr. Perkins that heterosexuals might want to get their own marriages in order first as they are not setting the gold standard of marriage at this stage.
</p>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:48:45 CST</pubDate>
    </item>

		
    <item>
      	<title>Comment 2</title>
      	<link>http://erlc.com/article/the&#45;face&#45;of&#45;marriage&#45;in&#45;america#comment2</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://erlc.com/article/the&#45;face&#45;of&#45;marriage&#45;in&#45;america#comment2</guid>
      	<description><![CDATA[<p>Your comment on marriages with multiple partners, simultaneous partners, children, and even animals is spot on.&nbsp; In Leviticus 18:22, the word tells us that a homosexual act is an abomination, and in verse 23, relations with animals are a perversion.&nbsp; Two chapters later (Lev. 20:13,15-16) it tells us that all parties in either situation are to be put to death.&nbsp; Instead, in America they are protected and even exalted as tolerant and enlightened. It is a grave reality that our nation is headed toward a total reversal of marriage where the sacred is disdained and the once unthinkable is applauded.&nbsp; Once the wall of the sanctity of marriage is breached, any and all violaters will be welcomed with open arms and the watchmen and soldiers on the wall who fight for the protection of marriage will be seen as archaic and doltish.
</p>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:12:52 CST</pubDate>
    </item>

		
    <item>
      	<title>Comment 3</title>
      	<link>http://erlc.com/article/the&#45;face&#45;of&#45;marriage&#45;in&#45;america#comment3</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://erlc.com/article/the&#45;face&#45;of&#45;marriage&#45;in&#45;america#comment3</guid>
      	<description><![CDATA[<p>Nathan is most correct about the passage in Leviticus.<br />
Here it is&#8230;Leviticus 20:13</p>

<p>NLT: (New Living Translation): &#8220;The penalty for homosexual acts is death to both parties. They have committed a detestable act, and are guilty of a capital offense.&#8221;</p>

<p>Who among you will carry this out?&nbsp; </p>

<p>Dan Valdes
</p>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 07:16:25 CST</pubDate>
    </item>

		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 12:56:49 CST</pubDate>
		
    <item>
      	<title>Comment 4</title>
      	<link>http://erlc.com/article/the&#45;face&#45;of&#45;marriage&#45;in&#45;america#comment4</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://erlc.com/article/the&#45;face&#45;of&#45;marriage&#45;in&#45;america#comment4</guid>
      	<description><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps I cannot name names or your tax exemption would be scrutinized, but you must know that both ultra-liberal contestants for the presidential nomination of one of the parties, have advocated the removal of all barriers to the radical homosexual agenda.&nbsp; This side must not win.
</p>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 12:56:49 CST</pubDate>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>