The Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission | Wilberforce Act Worth Consideration | Comments http://erlc.com/ This feed provides all comments on "Wilberforce Act Worth Consideration." en web-master@erlc.com ℗ & © 2009 ERLC Comment 1 http://erlc.com/article/wilberforce-act-worth-consideration#comment1 http://erlc.com/article/wilberforce-act-worth-consideration#comment1 Is our passion directed at the correct industry? Should christians passion be more directed toward the education of our children by the government programs, such as alternate lifestyles, abortion rights, and the date method change from AD-BC to BCE-CE being pushed by Jews, and Arab americans.
While the Wilberforce Act is valid it is only the symptom of an illness bred in judical decisions we must reject as tyranical to all Christians.

Very Sincerely
James Reeves

]]> Thu, 04 Dec 2008 11:06:06 CST Comment 2 http://erlc.com/article/wilberforce-act-worth-consideration#comment2 http://erlc.com/article/wilberforce-act-worth-consideration#comment2 James: your “an illness bred in judical decisions we must reject as tyranical to all Christians.” seems to indicate that you would favor legislated Christianity, which America has rejected as being a far greater tyranny.

Just what SPECIFIC tryanny do you suffer?

There are NO bad judgements; only those with which you disagree.

Let me guess; your background isn’t in constitutional law.

]]> Mon, 08 Dec 2008 19:28:50 CST Comment 3 http://erlc.com/article/wilberforce-act-worth-consideration#comment3 http://erlc.com/article/wilberforce-act-worth-consideration#comment3 eric: I would never suppose that faith in Jesus as Lord could either be forced or legislated but the illness I plainly noted can be diagnosed as sin,wrong,ugly, shameful,or ambigious.
The ” Bill of Rights ” given in the constitution was thoughtfully written and understood by and for the people living at that time. By the way if Christian thinkers of that time who signed the Declaration of Independence could have foreseen that judges would dictate what the law says instead of interpret the law they may have installed another branch.

James Reeves

]]> Wed, 10 Dec 2008 22:48:45 CST Comment 4 http://erlc.com/article/wilberforce-act-worth-consideration#comment4 http://erlc.com/article/wilberforce-act-worth-consideration#comment4 May I correct the symptom in my statement to ( treating the symptom) as it makes clear what I was trying to say. I am sorry if I orchestrated a different paradigm.

James E Reeves

]]> Wed, 10 Dec 2008 23:00:45 CST Comment 5 http://erlc.com/article/wilberforce-act-worth-consideration#comment5 http://erlc.com/article/wilberforce-act-worth-consideration#comment5 James: “..the illness I plainly noted can be diagnosed as sin,wrong,ugly, shameful,or ambigious.”

So? What does that have to do with judicial decisions?

Courts decide matters of LAW.

It is my understanding that your God will make the call on SIN, at the end of your mortal stay.

There are areas of overlap, enacted for social, not religious reasons. e.g. murder.

If you write LAW that punishes SIN, you have created a theocracy.


Your coulda-woulda-shoulda maybe if point on courts is immaterial. Deal with the law as written.

Without divergent ‘interpretations’ of the law, no court would be necessary. You’re just ticked because yours was ruled wrong. Get over it.

You still haven’t explained what SPECIFIC tyranny you suffer.

]]> Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:41:43 CST Comment 6 http://erlc.com/article/wilberforce-act-worth-consideration#comment6 http://erlc.com/article/wilberforce-act-worth-consideration#comment6 Eric: The 7th ammendment listed in the original “Bill Of Rights” encourages that the right of citizens to go to court in civil cases should be “preserved”. I had been working with AIG (American General) for 28 years but I could not follow the guide set forth to install forced arbitration without objection so I brought a copy of the bill of rights to work for all my peers to read but only after I had presented my ethical problem to all the appropreate management including the state of alabama insurance department head David Parsons. I was fired. Now I can tell you that all actions of law breakers are punished by God and sometimes by government as His insturment. This is not theocracy it is judgment imposed.
The wrong I saw is, I was being asked to not preserve the right of other citizens. When the blood of soldiers protecting and atempting to preserve the 7th ammendment call out can you tell me who hears?
Sincerely,
James

]]> Tue, 16 Dec 2008 08:43:43 CST Mon, 05 Jan 2009 11:22:59 CST Comment 7 http://erlc.com/article/wilberforce-act-worth-consideration#comment7 http://erlc.com/article/wilberforce-act-worth-consideration#comment7 Eric: I have personal ethics and some measure of dignity but the attacks on me came because I refused to sell out for profits.
My own lawyer could not understand that the principle of maintaining my ethics while working should be the real crime.
I am not over this but I trust in one who can see me through it.
Sincerely,
James

]]> Mon, 05 Jan 2009 11:22:59 CST