Article  Human Dignity  Life  Marriage and Family  Religious Liberty  Ethics  Religious Freedom  Religious Liberty

Three Christian moral ingredients at the American founding

A book on natural law and religious liberty that I am reading for an academic colloquium I am participating in is bringing to the forefront of my mind the uniqueness of the American founding and the moral principles that birthed our nation.

First, a word upfront: I offer the following comments in no way trying to advance a “Christian America” thesis. As a Baptist, I am resolutely committed to the idea of a nonconfessional state. At the same time, as a Baptist, I am firmly committed to the ideal that religion has tremendous latitude to shape a nation’s soul, even its laws.

The religious and moral backdrop of the nation informed the philosophical premises of the nascent American founding.

While the question of whose religious or moral vision reigned supreme during the Founding era is of perennial debate, it seems indisputable, to me at least, that Christianity was a moral grammar offering a rich tapestry of moral influence on the country’s philosophical architecture.

America’s founding and Christian ethics

In light of that presupposition (and knowing that historians will quibble and dispute what I will argue for), let me state what I believe are the three irreducible principles that made America, well, America; and then explain their relationship to Christian ethics:

  1. A belief in a stable and identifiable human nature.
  2. A belief in a universal morality known as Natural Law.
  3. A belief in limited government.

While I cannot say that the above principles are exclusive to Christianity alone, I do believe that Christianity informs each. In brief, let me walk through how Christianity touches on each.

When looking at the Founders’ understanding of humanity, they saw a portrait of the human person possessed with the capacity for virtue and vice. Humanity’s essence was not merely constructed; it is recognized as a divinely-endowed creature. There was a stable “nature”; that is, a way in which a human is expected to exist and function in order to fulfill the purpose of their existence. This is very much a pattern paralleling the Genesis account of God creating humanity (Gen. 1:26-28). The vision of government assumed by the Founders understood that citizens comprising the country would respond to the blessings of liberty and shirk at coercion as a constituent aspect of who humanity is as a liberty-seeking and meaning-making creature.

Perhaps looming most largely is the idea of natural law—the idea of a universal morality binding on all of humanity and accessible using one’s reason. The universe, in the Founders’ view, was orderly. Flourishing and “happiness” was found in accordance with a people and a country honoring the universal morality binding on its people. For the nation to prosper and its people be free, Americans would need to be virtuous. To live the virtuous life is to live in accord with right reason exhibited in one’s interactions with the world. For people to thrive, they need to obey what the Apostle Paul refers to as the “law written on the heart” (Rom. 2:14-15).

Lastly, limited government. Limited government springs from the idea that government does not have absolute power over every sphere of human existence. Many scholars point to Jesus’ declaration in Matthew 22:21 as the foundation for this idea: “Therefore render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s.” While most of us are familiar with Jesus’ teaching on this point by the sheer fact of familiarity, it is not an overstatement to say that this statement was revolutionary when first declared. According to Jesus, and how it has been understood through church history, government has legitimate areas of authority—paying taxes, punishing evil, etc. But government’s authority is not autonomous; it is a derived authority originating from God’s ultimate sovereignty.

A government that does not absolutize itself over the people under its watch is a government obeying its enumerated limits. This implies there are “pre-political” realities that dictate human purpose that the government has no say in dictating or defining, but in recognizing.

Why these principles?

Why these three principles? Why not mention “inalienable rights” or the “pursuit of happiness” or “checks and balances” as the abiding foundations of the American founding? Because each follow downstream from a prior moral ingredient. You do not have “rights” without a belief that humanity’s essence is identifiable and worth protecting; you do not have “happiness” and the worthwhileness of its pursuit apart from a universal concept of what “happiness” is, which implies natural law. You do not have checks and balances apart from a belief that human nature and the governments they form have a propensity toward amassing concentrated, absolute power that needs checked.

I am uncomfortable calling America a “Christian nation.” To say that, however, is not to dismiss or fail to recognize the profound ways that Christianity has impacted and informed basic elements of our constitutional order that we take for granted. May Christian influence remain.



Related Content

Support of Israel

Three Southern Baptist Letters in Support of Israel

Letters sent to the United Nations, President Biden, and Congressional leadership in October 2024

In light of the recent attack by Iran and the upcoming one year marker...

Read More
faith-based student organizations

A Letter in Support of Faith-Based Student Organizations

Letter sent to U.S. House Committee on Education and the Workforce on September 27, 2024

Faith-based student organizations on college campuses should be able to continue to serve their...

Read More
2025 appropriations

Letter to support valuing life in the 2025 appropriations process

Letter to U.S. House and Senate Appropriations Committees sent on September 9, 2024

As Congress prepare the federal budget for fiscal year 2025, the ERLC sent this...

Read More
pro-life and conscience protections in the NDAA

A letter to support pro-life and conscience protections in the NDAA

Sent to the U.S. Senate and House Armed Services Committees on August 26, 2024

Abortion, reproductive technologies, gender transitions, and military drafting of women have become a topic...

Read More
Assisted Suicide

ERLC Supports Concurrent Resolution Condemning Assisted Suicide

ERLC urges Congress to adopt House Concurrent Resolution 109

Southern Baptists affirm every life is worthy of protection and created in the image...

Read More
oppose biological men in women's sports

A letter to oppose biological men in women’s sports

Sent to NCAA President on August 6, 2024

The ERLC joined a letter to oppose biological men in women’s sports. This letter...

Read More