Policy / Support Conscience Protections

Support Conscience Protections

Federal lawmakers in the United States have a long history of protecting the religious liberty of all Americans by ensuring that healthcare professionals are able to work in a way that is consistent with their deeply held beliefs. Language provided in the Church Amendments, Weldon Amendment, and other provisions listed in Section 2 of the Conscience Protection Act has laid the groundwork for a rich legal history defending conscience protections for Americans, thereby protecting the right of all Americans to believe and express their religious and moral convictions.

Under existing federal law, organizations that receive federal funding are prohibited from coercing those with religious and moral objections to abortion into participating in or funding abortion services. The Church Amendment of 1973 states that hospitals or individuals who receive federal funds will not be required to participate in abortion. The Hyde Amendment prohibits government appropriations from being used to fund abortion or health benefits that cover of abortion. The Weldon Amendment prohibits appropriations to the Departments of Labor, HHS, and Education to be used to discriminate against any healthcare entity that refuses to provide, cover, fund, or refer abortions. The consensus on these compromises between abortion and conscience rights has held for decades, as both the Hyde and Weldon amendments have been attached to every appropriations bill passed through Congress and signed into law at the White House since 2004.

Despite clear legal and ethical violations with such policies, numerous state governments and entities receiving government funds are in violation of these federal protections. In 2009, a New York nurse was forced by her superiors to assist in the dismemberment abortion of a 22-week-old baby. When she objected, she was threatened with the loss of her job. By coercing the nurse, the hospital violated the Church Amendment, a related conscience protection. Another example of abuse occurred in 2011 when a Catholic refugee agency was denied an HHS grant renewal for serving survivors of human trafficking. In a blatant violation of both the Hyde and Weldon amendments, HHS denied the grant because the agency refused to refer their survivor clients to healthcare providers that covered abortion.

As Southern Baptists, we have fiercely held our conviction to support and advocate for religious liberty since our formation as a denomination. Religious liberty is not solely a question of legal concern, but a matter of deeply rooted theological thought; our consciences are beholden first to the Lord, and second to one another.

The Conscience Protection Act would provide protection in the form of explicitly stated legal remedies for healthcare providers who refuse to provide, perform, refer, or pay for abortions. Currently, the only enforcement mechanism for conscience protection violations is to eliminate federal funding to the state government or entity in question, as Church, Hyde, and Weldon are “limitation of funds” riders. The elimination of federal funds to an entire state is an unreasonable, and therefore rarely used, response. A better avenue of enforcement is needed. No healthcare worker should have to compromise their deeply held beliefs in order to administer care, and the federal government must ensure that affected medical professionals are provided sufficient legal remedies if their conscience is violated.

Further, the Conscience Protections for Medical Residents Act would extend necessary protections to residency programs where rising medical professionals are being coerced into abortion instruction and provision. Currently, medical residents with religious or moral objections to abortion must opt out of training for abortions in their accredited programs. However, oftentimes, out of fear of being penalized in their training, medical students do not. This bill would instead require graduate medical programs to enforce an opt-in policy for abortion training, protecting religious students from discrimination for their beliefs. No person should be forced to violate their conscience when pursuing their career. This bill is a necessary step to ensuring that conscience rights and religious perspectives are not just accommodated in medical settings but respected.

The ERLC urges Congress to pass the Conscience Protection Act and the Conscience Protections for Medical Residents Act. We urge Congress to uphold its duty to the American people by codifying legal protections for the people in our healthcare system courageously standing for their convictions and abiding by their oath to “do no harm” to their patients. These bills will move us closer to a healthcare system that, in providing quality care, honors the conscience of every person.