True Love Waits relaunched, refocused as True Love Project

February 11, 2014

In July 1994, more than 210,000 cards from teenagers pledging to remain sexually pure were displayed on the National Mall in Washington, D.C.

Twenty years later, the iconic True Love Waits program is being relaunched through a new resource called The True Love Project, a video-driven Bible study for students written by author and speaker Clayton King.

“Over that twenty years, one of the unintended consequences of the True Love Waits movement was that it became more about the commitment card and virginity than about Jesus and his gospel,” said Ben Trueblood, director of student ministry at LifeWay Christian Resources, the organization behind TLW.

Personal purity

While Trueblood agrees sexual purity is an important issue for students today, that alone cannot drive the conversation. He maintains the core message of True Love Waits has always been that “purity is possible because of Jesus and is for Jesus.”

The True Love Project, released in December, brings that to the forefront. “Jesus is the destination and our worship of Him needs to take center stage.”

King set out to capture that in the curriculum. “I am not attempting to say anything new,” he explained, “but rather to draw attention to the ancient and unchangeable truth of God's word; that Jesus is Lord of all of creation, including our bodies and our sexuality.”

The refocused message has been inherent in True Love Waits from the beginning, according to Richard Ross, one of the cofounders of the movement two decades ago.

Ross, now a professor of student ministry at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, and Jimmy Hester, a previous director of student ministry publishing at LifeWay, discussed the issue of sexual purity and what could be done about it.

“All we had were napkins at the coffee shop, so we wrote on those,” Ross said.

At the time, he was a youth ministry consultant for LifeWay and a student minister at a local church. The first 53 students to participate were from his church.

Spiritual transformation

In their commitment, these early adoptees were “affirming their love for Jesus through their commitment to purity,” said Ross.

Since that day, an estimated three million students have made that pledge around the world. In Uganda, True Love Waits was used to drop the prevalence rates of HIV/AIDS, which was above 30 percent in some parts of the country, to below seven percent.

According to Ross, the percentage of teenagers who are sexually involved continued to climb from 1973 until 1993. Since then, however, it plateaued and has been in decline each year.

Ross attributes that in part to True Love Waits and a change in the attitude of Christian leaders. “The Surgeon General of the United States said, 'American teenagers are incapable of controlling themselves,'” Ross said. “Teenagers felt that adults had given up on them.”

He said True Love Waits affirmed the fact that through God's strength, students could remain sexually pure.

For King, that legacy is something on which he wants to build. “I was part of the movement when it began,” he said. “I spoke at one of the very first True Love Waits DiscipleNow weekends.

“I signed the card, along with hundreds of thousands of students, and I still meet people today who give testimony to a season in their adolescence when they began to discover God's design for love and intimacy through True Love Waits.”

Trueblood recognizes “God has used True Love Waits in an incredible way,” but he believes “God has opened the door for the True Love Waits message to be restated, to once again point people to the gospel through this very important issue in our culture.”

In the midst of a culture that is sex-saturated, Trueblood said today's generation needs a new message. “They need to see how the gospel impacts their purity and how their choices in purity are about more than their sexual decisions,” he said.

Gospel-centered worship

Trueblood would even frame the issue within the Great Commission. “When a student chooses, in Jesus' power, to live out God's plan of purity, they will instantly stand out in the culture and be given a platform for the gospel,” he said.

It can be understood within the concept of worship, according to Ross. “This is about a lifetime of purity,” he said. “This is not a temporary thing, hoping a husband or wife will show up. Rather, this is something that I can do for my King.”

When students make this commitment to purity, they are “placing before God their most intimate gift,” said Ross. “They are saying, 'My purity is my love gift to You.'”

The new eight-session curriculum authored by King, a youth evangelist and teaching pastor at NewSpring Church in Anderson, S.C., captures the gospel-centric focus that Ross implanted in the original and that Trueblood wanted to bring back to the forefront.

According to Trueblood, King's heart for students and desire to see them know Christ made him the right fit for The True Love Project.

“Clayton has long been committed to teaching students the importance of purity and that Christ is at the center of it,” said Trueblood. “He is also someone who has followed God's plan for purity in his own life. By God's grace, he was able to live out what we are challenging students to do through the True Love Project.”

By beginning lessons in the broader paradigm of the story of the Bible—Creation, Fall, Redemption, Restoration—Trueblood believes King's lessons will give them the proper perspective for later lessons dealing specifically with sex and purity.

When going through the new True Love Project, Trueblood said churches and student ministers can expect their students “will be challenged to live a pure life in Jesus' power.”

King said that means more than simply not having sex. “Repeatedly, I say that the goal is not to be a virgin on your wedding day,” he said, “but to be found faithful on Judgment Day.”

Total life Lordship

While, according to King, the lessons proclaim unwaveringly the “Lordship of Christ over every aspect of our lives, including our sexuality,” there is an emphasis on everyone's need of grace.

“I want people to know they are pure because Jesus purified them from sin, not because they have perfect behavior and have never had intercourse or looked at porn,” said King. “The good news is that temptation, lust, porn, sex, shame, and guilt are no match for the grace that Jesus offers us.”

That meshes well with what Ross has said from the beginning. “Point kids to Jesus,” he said. “Only He has power enough to grip their heart and their will.”

Trueblood, King and Ross agree. Whether a coffee shop napkin, the National Mall, a village in Uganda, or a classroom at a local church, True Love Waits and now the new resource, The True Love Project, has always had one message at its core—”only Jesus can make us pure.”

For more information, visit TrueLoveWaits.com.

View the original article here.

Aaron Earls

Aaron Earl serves as a writer and Editor for Facts and Trends, an online resource designed to help pastors and other Christian leaders navigate the issues and trends impacting the church. He was born and raised in the South and now lives in Tennessee with his wife and four children.  Read More

Article 12: The Future of AI

We affirm that AI will continue to be developed in ways that we cannot currently imagine or understand, including AI that will far surpass many human abilities. God alone has the power to create life, and no future advancements in AI will usurp Him as the Creator of life. The church has a unique role in proclaiming human dignity for all and calling for the humane use of AI in all aspects of society.

We deny that AI will make us more or less human, or that AI will ever obtain a coequal level of worth, dignity, or value to image-bearers. Future advancements in AI will not ultimately fulfill our longings for a perfect world. While we are not able to comprehend or know the future, we do not fear what is to come because we know that God is omniscient and that nothing we create will be able to thwart His redemptive plan for creation or to supplant humanity as His image-bearers.

Genesis 1; Isaiah 42:8; Romans 1:20-21; 5:2; Ephesians 1:4-6; 2 Timothy 1:7-9; Revelation 5:9-10

Article 11: Public Policy

We affirm that the fundamental purposes of government are to protect human beings from harm, punish those who do evil, uphold civil liberties, and to commend those who do good. The public has a role in shaping and crafting policies concerning the use of AI in society, and these decisions should not be left to those who develop these technologies or to governments to set norms.

We deny that AI should be used by governments, corporations, or any entity to infringe upon God-given human rights. AI, even in a highly advanced state, should never be delegated the governing authority that has been granted by an all-sovereign God to human beings alone. 

Romans 13:1-7; Acts 10:35; 1 Peter 2:13-14

Article 10: War

We affirm that the use of AI in warfare should be governed by love of neighbor and the principles of just war. The use of AI may mitigate the loss of human life, provide greater protection of non-combatants, and inform better policymaking. Any lethal action conducted or substantially enabled by AI must employ 5 human oversight or review. All defense-related AI applications, such as underlying data and decision-making processes, must be subject to continual review by legitimate authorities. When these systems are deployed, human agents bear full moral responsibility for any actions taken by the system.

We deny that human agency or moral culpability in war can be delegated to AI. No nation or group has the right to use AI to carry out genocide, terrorism, torture, or other war crimes.

Genesis 4:10; Isaiah 1:16-17; Psalm 37:28; Matthew 5:44; 22:37-39; Romans 13:4

Article 9: Security

We affirm that AI has legitimate applications in policing, intelligence, surveillance, investigation, and other uses supporting the government’s responsibility to respect human rights, to protect and preserve human life, and to pursue justice in a flourishing society.

We deny that AI should be employed for safety and security applications in ways that seek to dehumanize, depersonalize, or harm our fellow human beings. We condemn the use of AI to suppress free expression or other basic human rights granted by God to all human beings.

Romans 13:1-7; 1 Peter 2:13-14

Article 8: Data & Privacy

We affirm that privacy and personal property are intertwined individual rights and choices that should not be violated by governments, corporations, nation-states, and other groups, even in the pursuit of the common good. While God knows all things, it is neither wise nor obligatory to have every detail of one’s life open to society.

We deny the manipulative and coercive uses of data and AI in ways that are inconsistent with the love of God and love of neighbor. Data collection practices should conform to ethical guidelines that uphold the dignity of all people. We further deny that consent, even informed consent, although requisite, is the only necessary ethical standard for the collection, manipulation, or exploitation of personal data—individually or in the aggregate. AI should not be employed in ways that distort truth through the use of generative applications. Data should not be mishandled, misused, or abused for sinful purposes to reinforce bias, strengthen the powerful, or demean the weak.

Exodus 20:15, Psalm 147:5; Isaiah 40:13-14; Matthew 10:16 Galatians 6:2; Hebrews 4:12-13; 1 John 1:7 

Article 7: Work

We affirm that work is part of God’s plan for human beings participating in the cultivation and stewardship of creation. The divine pattern is one of labor and rest in healthy proportion to each other. Our view of work should not be confined to commercial activity; it must also include the many ways that human beings serve each other through their efforts. AI can be used in ways that aid our work or allow us to make fuller use of our gifts. The church has a Spirit-empowered responsibility to help care for those who lose jobs and to encourage individuals, communities, employers, and governments to find ways to invest in the development of human beings and continue making vocational contributions to our lives together.

We deny that human worth and dignity is reducible to an individual’s economic contributions to society alone. Humanity should not use AI and other technological innovations as a reason to move toward lives of pure leisure even if greater social wealth creates such possibilities.

Genesis 1:27; 2:5; 2:15; Isaiah 65:21-24; Romans 12:6-8; Ephesians 4:11-16

Article 6: Sexuality

We affirm the goodness of God’s design for human sexuality which prescribes the sexual union to be an exclusive relationship between a man and a woman in the lifelong covenant of marriage.

We deny that the pursuit of sexual pleasure is a justification for the development or use of AI, and we condemn the objectification of humans that results from employing AI for sexual purposes. AI should not intrude upon or substitute for the biblical expression of sexuality between a husband and wife according to God’s design for human marriage.

Genesis 1:26-29; 2:18-25; Matthew 5:27-30; 1 Thess 4:3-4

Article 5: Bias

We affirm that, as a tool created by humans, AI will be inherently subject to bias and that these biases must be accounted for, minimized, or removed through continual human oversight and discretion. AI should be designed and used in such ways that treat all human beings as having equal worth and dignity. AI should be utilized as a tool to identify and eliminate bias inherent in human decision-making.

We deny that AI should be designed or used in ways that violate the fundamental principle of human dignity for all people. Neither should AI be used in ways that reinforce or further any ideology or agenda, seeking to subjugate human autonomy under the power of the state.

Micah 6:8; John 13:34; Galatians 3:28-29; 5:13-14; Philippians 2:3-4; Romans 12:10

Article 4: Medicine

We affirm that AI-related advances in medical technologies are expressions of God’s common grace through and for people created in His image and that these advances will increase our capacity to provide enhanced medical diagnostics and therapeutic interventions as we seek to care for all people. These advances should be guided by basic principles of medical ethics, including beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice, which are all consistent with the biblical principle of loving our neighbor.

We deny that death and disease—effects of the Fall—can ultimately be eradicated apart from Jesus Christ. Utilitarian applications regarding healthcare distribution should not override the dignity of human life. Fur- 3 thermore, we reject the materialist and consequentialist worldview that understands medical applications of AI as a means of improving, changing, or completing human beings.

Matthew 5:45; John 11:25-26; 1 Corinthians 15:55-57; Galatians 6:2; Philippians 2:4

Article 3: Relationship of AI & Humanity

We affirm the use of AI to inform and aid human reasoning and moral decision-making because it is a tool that excels at processing data and making determinations, which often mimics or exceeds human ability. While AI excels in data-based computation, technology is incapable of possessing the capacity for moral agency or responsibility.

We deny that humans can or should cede our moral accountability or responsibilities to any form of AI that will ever be created. Only humanity will be judged by God on the basis of our actions and that of the tools we create. While technology can be created with a moral use in view, it is not a moral agent. Humans alone bear the responsibility for moral decision making.

Romans 2:6-8; Galatians 5:19-21; 2 Peter 1:5-8; 1 John 2:1

Article 2: AI as Technology

We affirm that the development of AI is a demonstration of the unique creative abilities of human beings. When AI is employed in accordance with God’s moral will, it is an example of man’s obedience to the divine command to steward creation and to honor Him. We believe in innovation for the glory of God, the sake of human flourishing, and the love of neighbor. While we acknowledge the reality of the Fall and its consequences on human nature and human innovation, technology can be used in society to uphold human dignity. As a part of our God-given creative nature, human beings should develop and harness technology in ways that lead to greater flourishing and the alleviation of human suffering.

We deny that the use of AI is morally neutral. It is not worthy of man’s hope, worship, or love. Since the Lord Jesus alone can atone for sin and reconcile humanity to its Creator, technology such as AI cannot fulfill humanity’s ultimate needs. We further deny the goodness and benefit of any application of AI that devalues or degrades the dignity and worth of another human being. 

Genesis 2:25; Exodus 20:3; 31:1-11; Proverbs 16:4; Matthew 22:37-40; Romans 3:23

Article 1: Image of God

We affirm that God created each human being in His image with intrinsic and equal worth, dignity, and moral agency, distinct from all creation, and that humanity’s creativity is intended to reflect God’s creative pattern.

We deny that any part of creation, including any form of technology, should ever be used to usurp or subvert the dominion and stewardship which has been entrusted solely to humanity by God; nor should technology be assigned a level of human identity, worth, dignity, or moral agency.

Genesis 1:26-28; 5:1-2; Isaiah 43:6-7; Jeremiah 1:5; John 13:34; Colossians 1:16; 3:10; Ephesians 4:24