Religious Liberty  Oppose attacks on the Religious Freedom Restoration Act  Policy Brief  Religious Freedom

ERLC Opposes Attacks on the Religious Freedom Restoration Act

Religious Freedom Restoration Act

Southern Baptists recognize the importance of religious liberty, which is the preeminent right included by our Founders in the Constitution. The Baptist Faith & Message states “a free church in a free state is the Christian ideal, and this implies the right of free and unhindered access to God on the part of all men, and the right to form and propagate opinions in the sphere of religion without interference by the civil power.” Stretching back generations, Southern Baptists have a rich heritage of affirming the importance of and fighting to maintain protections for religious liberty for people of all faiths, while acknowledging that God extends salvation to all who believe and actively working to share the gospel with all.

In 1993, the near-unanimous passage of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) by Congress ushered in a new certainty in religious liberty protections by the federal government. The RFRA ensures that in cases where the federal government is exerting a requirement upon religious and faith-based employees and employers, the government must meet the highest standards of scrutiny instead of forcing employees and faith-based employers to needlessly sacrifice their deeply held religious convictions. RFRA also provides individuals with a right to private action, thereby holding the federal government accountable for violations of these protections.

Despite the bipartisan origin of RFRA, in recent years, there has been a concerted push to undermine RFRA’s effectiveness through federal rulemaking and legislative proposals, often in an effort to promote harmful “gender ideology.” While RFRA protections remain strong, some legislators from both parties include exemptions to RFRA in proposed bills, meaning that RFRA would not apply to new statutes created. Additionally, in federal rulemaking, there is a push to override religious liberty protections by intentionally misrepresenting the beliefs of some groups; for example, on Nove. 27, 2023, the ERLC submitted public comments in response to a Health and Human Services proposed rule that would require states placing children in foster care to not place LGBTQ-identifying children with faith-based agencies that were not affirming.

The ERLC continues to advocate against any attempts to weaken or undermine RFRA protections and on behalf of the concerns of Southern Baptists who depend on RFRA to live out their beliefs in service to others.

Religious Freedom Restoration Act


Related Content

Trump's first 100 days

5 Policy Priorities for President Trump’s First 100 Days

The ERLC sent this letter to the Trump transition team with policies to prioritize...

Read More
tax

Priorities for 2025 Tax Negotiations

Tax Changes to Promote Life and Support Families

Southern Baptists place a high value on the institution of the family, referred to...

Read More
2025 appropriations

Letter to support valuing life in the 2025 appropriations process

Letter to U.S. House and Senate Appropriations Committees sent on September 9, 2024

As Congress prepare the federal budget for fiscal year 2025, the ERLC sent this...

Read More
Assisted Suicide

ERLC Supports Concurrent Resolution Condemning Assisted Suicide

ERLC urges Congress to adopt House Concurrent Resolution 109

Southern Baptists affirm every life is worthy of protection and created in the image...

Read More
mocking of Christianity at the Olympics

A letter to oppose the mocking of Christianity at the Olympics

Sent to the President of the International Olympic Committee on July 29, 2024

The below letter was sent to Thomas Bach, President of the International Olympic Committee...

Read More
oppose the reclassification of marijuana

Public Comments Submitted to Oppose the Reclassification of Marijuana

Submitted to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Department of Justice on July 22, 2024

The ERLC submits public comments to the Drug Enforcement Administration to oppose the reclassification...

Read More