Light Magazine Spotlight Articles  Human Dignity  Life  Marriage and Family  Religious Liberty  Public Square

Is the Lesser of Two Evils the Right Question?

Christians Political Engagement in a Wildly Imperfect World

On the Sunday before the 2016 general election, I visited family a few hours from home and attended church with them. The pastor acknowledged the tension that many in the congregation felt regarding the election and the controversial presidential candidates involved. His opening sentence on the topic rang true to me: “You don’t have a godly candidate on the ballot on Tuesday, and the reason you don’t is because of our great sin.” The flawed candidates, he said, were a reflection of us as a nation.

In a world that seems more opposed to the teachings of Scripture by the day, Christians frequently face a slate of choices, all of which fail to meet God’s standards of righteousness in some way. How do we cope with a world that repeatedly asks us to choose between the lesser of two evils? After all, the lesser evil is still, by definition, evil. And God’s Word calls us to avoid even the appearance of such (1 Thessalonians 5:22).

At the same time, fully withdrawing from public engagement makes us disobedient in another sense by ignoring the biblical charges to speak the truth (Ephesians 4:15), advocate for justice (Isaiah 1:17), and protect the vulnerable. When we walk away from “the great conversation,” we leave a void where the wisdom of God should be represented.

I believe that as sojourners in a fallen world, we are called to do the best we can with the circumstances we’re given. Sometimes this may mean choosing an imperfect option. It might look like voting for a flawed candidate to prevent the even greater wrong we believe their opponent would do. It could mean supporting a bill that accomplishes some things that we know are pleasing to God, even if it doesn’t go as far as we know it should go.

The danger in this type of public engagement is that it can confuse non-believing observers who don’t understand our rationale. They may interpret our action as fully representative of the teachings of the Christian faith when it most certainly is not. Worse yet, it may confuse us if we fully buy into our team’s talking points.

So how do we avoid these misunderstandings?

Honesty is the best policy

I think the keys to walking this tightrope with integrity lie in two areas: honest comparison of the choices we face to the biblical standard and honest communication about our engagement.

Like all modern marketing and communication, the American political machine is scarily good at pushing our buttons to elicit feelings that turn into action. They come to each issue armed with mountains of polling data and research revealing what makes us tick: what we fear and what we value. Whether they’re selling a candidate or a cause, they sell it in an all-upside, no-downside way.

Legions of highly paid consultants convince you that if you don’t vote or engage as they suggest, disaster is inevitable, and all of your deepest fears will come to pass. Similarly, they present their favored candidate/initiative as a cure-all for your concerns, with no baggage. 

Intellectually, we know this isn’t true. But emotionally, we get pulled in. We respond to the appeal and invest. 

This moment of investment is where civic engagement can go off the rails for Christians. Once we choose a candidate or cause—and especially if we publicly declare our affiliation with such—we are psychologically incentivized to think and speak of our choice positively, emphasizing what is good about it and staying quiet about what is not. We may rationalize that this is strategically necessary to rally others to our cause and ensure that our team wins the day.

There will be time for the whole truth later, we think. Now is the time to win.

But as believers, we are called to hold each decision—every day—up to the light of God’s Word, judging it fairly by that standard alone. We must overcome the psychological temptation to recast our marginally better choice as a genuinely righteous one. We must be honest with ourselves and others about how our choices do and do not measure up to God’s standard. 

When we misrepresent our imperfect choices as truly righteous, we compromise our integrity and misrepresent our Savior before a lost and dying world. We make it harder for the people we’re called to evangelize to believe us about the most important thing—the gospel of Jesus Christ.

That’s a terrible trade. 

I think Christians must remain engaged in the culture and the political process. But we must say goodbye to the unqualified cheerleading that others enjoy. If we are to honor God in the public square, our participation and the way we talk about it must be consistently faithful and painfully honest. This will make us outliers in many conversations where others feel free to give full-throated endorsements of things we know miss the mark in key ways. 

However, we can trust God to work through our faithfulness to accomplish his purposes, despite what the modern rules of political and cultural engagement may suggest.



Related Content

Trump's first 100 days

5 Policy Priorities for President Trump’s First 100 Days

The ERLC sent this letter to the Trump transition team with policies to prioritize...

Read More
intercountry adoption with china

Letter to support intercountry adoption with China

Letter sent to Secretary of State Blinken on October 24, 2024

Intercountry adoption with China provides children in need with loving, permanent families. In light...

Read More
tax

Priorities for 2025 Tax Negotiations

Tax Changes to Promote Life and Support Families

Southern Baptists place a high value on the institution of the family, referred to...

Read More
Support of Israel

Three Southern Baptist Letters in Support of Israel

Letters sent to the United Nations, President Biden, and Congressional leadership in October 2024

In light of the recent attack by Iran and the upcoming one year marker...

Read More
faith-based student organizations

A Letter in Support of Faith-Based Student Organizations

Letter sent to U.S. House Committee on Education and the Workforce on September 27, 2024

Faith-based student organizations on college campuses should be able to continue to serve their...

Read More
2025 appropriations

Letter to support valuing life in the 2025 appropriations process

Letter to U.S. House and Senate Appropriations Committees sent on September 9, 2024

As Congress prepare the federal budget for fiscal year 2025, the ERLC sent this...

Read More