Article  Human Dignity  Life  Marriage and Family  Religious Liberty  Sexuality

HHS finalizes rules reversing regulations on sexual orientation and gender identity from the Obama era

Under Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act, Congress prohibited covered health plans and programs from discriminating on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability, the classes long recognized under our civil rights laws. However, in May 2016, the Obama administration issued new regulations that expanded the scope of section 1557’s nondiscrimination prohibitions by redefining “sex” to include sexual orientation and gender identity.

These new regulations raised a number of significant religious liberty issues and pro-life issues. For instance, physicians would be required to provide gender reassignment surgeries, administer hormones to facilitate gender reassignment, and even perform abortions in violation of the consciences of medical professionals.

In response to the issuance of these new regulations, on Aug. 23, 2016, five states and three private health care providers filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas challenging the final rules in the case Franciscan Alliance, Inc., et al. v. Burwell, et al. The District Court held that HHS erroneously interpreted “sex” under Title IX, that the Final Rule was arbitrary and capricious when Title IX “unambiguously refers to the biological and anatomical differences between male and female students as determined at their birth.” The District Court further ruled that the Final Rule’s failure to include religious exemptions likely violated the Religious Freedom and Restoration Act (RFRA) and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).

As a result, the District Court in Franciscan Alliance issued a nationwide preliminary injunction on the 2016 rule. The preliminary injunction remains in place today and the 2016 rule has never come into effect.

Today, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services finalized a new rule that replaces the 2016 rules and brings HHS’s nondiscrimination regulations back in line with federal law passed by Congress.

The ERLC submitted written comments in support of the change that may be accessed here.

For more information on the finalized rules, please see the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ press release on the new rules. HHS has released the draft final rule as well as a factsheet explaining the implications of the rule.



Related Content

Dobbs and pro-life advocacy

Why we still need pro-life advocacy 4 years after Dobbs 

On this day four years ago, the Supreme Court of the United States overturned...

Read More
landor

Explainer: Supreme Court denies monetary damages for prisoners when religious liberty rights are violated

The Supreme Court handed down its decision in Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections...

Read More

How the mission of the ERLC serves our churches

2026 SBC annual meeting reflections

The SBC annual meeting feels like a big family reunion or holiday gathering each...

Read More

Explainer: How should Southern Baptists respond to “Pride Month?”

Every June, television airwaves, business storefronts, and social media are flooded with messages celebrating...

Read More

ERLC, NC Baptists partner for Psalm 139 Project’s 100th ultrasound placement

This was originally published by North Carolina Baptists. When Megan Knight started The Mercy...

Read More
Supreme Court and religious liberty

Explainer: Supreme Court unanimously rules in favor of New Jersey pregnancy resource centers

In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court ruled that a New Jersey pregnancy resource...

Read More