fbpx
Articles

Christians must lead the way in renouncing white supremacy

/
October 28, 2017

When white supremacy is on the march, Satan rejoices. This is all the more reason that followers of Christ should unite in the face of such evil, particularly when it lands in your backyard.

It is highly doubtful that anyone is ever really prepared for their hometown to become the next front in this battle. Yet, it happens; and, unfairly, cities like Charlottesville get linked with the racist imagery that emanates from white power rallies. Now, it’s Shelbyville’s turn.

This quiet Southern town in Tennessee, which is a meandering hour or so south of Nashville, is perhaps most famous for being the Tennessee Walking Horse capital of the world. It is home to a healthy business community and a strong agricultural industry. It is a picturesque setting that is more appropriate for a feature film than a frontline.

Bedford County, of which Shelbyville is the county seat, has a historic past. At one time, it was Tennessee’s largest county, both in terms of area and population. During the Civil War, Shelbyville itself was a bastion of Union support, which surely dismays the neo-Confederate fanfic purveyors who are gathering there this weekend. Of course, that assumes they know the history of the area which, in my dealings with racists, extends them far too much credit.

Since explorers first set foot on the shores of what would become our nation, we have been marred by racist ideology. Whole economies were set up on the premise that one race should enslave another. Even institutions that may have been well-meaning in their design were created from one particular racial perspective to the detriment of our brothers and sisters of color. Countless leaders and citizens have lost their lives simply reminding our nation that we were founded on a unique principle among governments: All men are created equal.

Yet that lofty ideal has never been fully attained. As we sit here in 2017, this country has certainly come a long way. But instances like Charlottesville this summer, and now Shelbyville, prove we have much further to go. I am convinced it is the church, and the witness of individual Christians, that will lead us there.

We must first recognize the evil of white supremacy in our midst and call it out for what it is. Dr. Randy Davis, the president of the Tennessee Baptist Mission Board, bravely convened a multi-ethnic gathering of Baptist pastors this week to condemn the rally in Shelbyville. “This movement is evil. It is contrary to everything we are called to be as Christians,” he remarked.

It is worth noting the clarity with which Dr. Davis stated his belief. There is no equivocation to be found.

Too often, white Christians soften their rhetoric in the face of racism or disengage entirely in a shallow attempt to ignore it. That is the wrong approach. It is exactly what Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was speaking to in his statement, “In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends.” Davis and the pastors he brought together are to be commended for their forthright leadership in this moment.

So, too, should the Southern Baptist Convention, even with our troubled past on this issue. In 1995, messengers to the SBC affirmed a resolution that rightly pointed out, “Racism profoundly distorts our understanding of Christian morality, leading some Southern Baptists to believe that racial prejudice and discrimination are compatible with the gospel.” This is saying, in effect, that remaining silent or shirking our responsibility to speak out forcefully gives white supremacy cover and leads fellow believers astray.

Moreover, we should speak not just for the sake of the church, but for the purpose of bettering the public square where, currently, white supremacy has gained a foothold in our politics. It has done so through the vehicle known as the Alt-Right Movement. While attempting to disguise itself as some form of political conservatism, this “movement” is nothing more than a scheme to peddle white nationalism. Sadly, some voters seem to be aligning with this political force. But, Christians should be active in our opposition to such an electoral virus. This summer, the SBC passed a resolution in a nearly-unanimous vote doing just that. The resolution decried, “every form of racism, including alt-right white supremacy, as antithetical to the Gospel of Jesus Christ.”

In the confusing and turbulent times we live in, these types of clear-eyed statements from church leaders and everyday gospel-abiding individuals are needed to pierce through the noise in the system so others can see our example and, more importantly, see Christ who unites us (Gal. 3:28). It is a challenge, no doubt. But the pursuit of real racial harmony is worth the cost. If we are truly committed to being doers of the Word (James 1:22), we will be compelled to see these wrongs, speak out against them, and act accordingly.

So as the forces of division and darkness descend upon Tennessee, let us pray for this moment and live out the diversity we will see in heaven. And what a remarkable contrast that will present compared to the white power rally which will display nothing but a homogeneity of hatred that is recognizable only to hell itself.

F. Brent Leatherwood

Brent Leatherwood was elected as president of the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission in 2022, after a year of leading the organization as acting president. Previously, he served as chief of staff at the ERLC, as well as the entity’s director of strategic partnerships. He brings an expertise in public … Read More

Article 12: The Future of AI

We affirm that AI will continue to be developed in ways that we cannot currently imagine or understand, including AI that will far surpass many human abilities. God alone has the power to create life, and no future advancements in AI will usurp Him as the Creator of life. The church has a unique role in proclaiming human dignity for all and calling for the humane use of AI in all aspects of society.

We deny that AI will make us more or less human, or that AI will ever obtain a coequal level of worth, dignity, or value to image-bearers. Future advancements in AI will not ultimately fulfill our longings for a perfect world. While we are not able to comprehend or know the future, we do not fear what is to come because we know that God is omniscient and that nothing we create will be able to thwart His redemptive plan for creation or to supplant humanity as His image-bearers.

Genesis 1; Isaiah 42:8; Romans 1:20-21; 5:2; Ephesians 1:4-6; 2 Timothy 1:7-9; Revelation 5:9-10

Article 11: Public Policy

We affirm that the fundamental purposes of government are to protect human beings from harm, punish those who do evil, uphold civil liberties, and to commend those who do good. The public has a role in shaping and crafting policies concerning the use of AI in society, and these decisions should not be left to those who develop these technologies or to governments to set norms.

We deny that AI should be used by governments, corporations, or any entity to infringe upon God-given human rights. AI, even in a highly advanced state, should never be delegated the governing authority that has been granted by an all-sovereign God to human beings alone. 

Romans 13:1-7; Acts 10:35; 1 Peter 2:13-14

Article 10: War

We affirm that the use of AI in warfare should be governed by love of neighbor and the principles of just war. The use of AI may mitigate the loss of human life, provide greater protection of non-combatants, and inform better policymaking. Any lethal action conducted or substantially enabled by AI must employ 5 human oversight or review. All defense-related AI applications, such as underlying data and decision-making processes, must be subject to continual review by legitimate authorities. When these systems are deployed, human agents bear full moral responsibility for any actions taken by the system.

We deny that human agency or moral culpability in war can be delegated to AI. No nation or group has the right to use AI to carry out genocide, terrorism, torture, or other war crimes.

Genesis 4:10; Isaiah 1:16-17; Psalm 37:28; Matthew 5:44; 22:37-39; Romans 13:4

Article 9: Security

We affirm that AI has legitimate applications in policing, intelligence, surveillance, investigation, and other uses supporting the government’s responsibility to respect human rights, to protect and preserve human life, and to pursue justice in a flourishing society.

We deny that AI should be employed for safety and security applications in ways that seek to dehumanize, depersonalize, or harm our fellow human beings. We condemn the use of AI to suppress free expression or other basic human rights granted by God to all human beings.

Romans 13:1-7; 1 Peter 2:13-14

Article 8: Data & Privacy

We affirm that privacy and personal property are intertwined individual rights and choices that should not be violated by governments, corporations, nation-states, and other groups, even in the pursuit of the common good. While God knows all things, it is neither wise nor obligatory to have every detail of one’s life open to society.

We deny the manipulative and coercive uses of data and AI in ways that are inconsistent with the love of God and love of neighbor. Data collection practices should conform to ethical guidelines that uphold the dignity of all people. We further deny that consent, even informed consent, although requisite, is the only necessary ethical standard for the collection, manipulation, or exploitation of personal data—individually or in the aggregate. AI should not be employed in ways that distort truth through the use of generative applications. Data should not be mishandled, misused, or abused for sinful purposes to reinforce bias, strengthen the powerful, or demean the weak.

Exodus 20:15, Psalm 147:5; Isaiah 40:13-14; Matthew 10:16 Galatians 6:2; Hebrews 4:12-13; 1 John 1:7 

Article 7: Work

We affirm that work is part of God’s plan for human beings participating in the cultivation and stewardship of creation. The divine pattern is one of labor and rest in healthy proportion to each other. Our view of work should not be confined to commercial activity; it must also include the many ways that human beings serve each other through their efforts. AI can be used in ways that aid our work or allow us to make fuller use of our gifts. The church has a Spirit-empowered responsibility to help care for those who lose jobs and to encourage individuals, communities, employers, and governments to find ways to invest in the development of human beings and continue making vocational contributions to our lives together.

We deny that human worth and dignity is reducible to an individual’s economic contributions to society alone. Humanity should not use AI and other technological innovations as a reason to move toward lives of pure leisure even if greater social wealth creates such possibilities.

Genesis 1:27; 2:5; 2:15; Isaiah 65:21-24; Romans 12:6-8; Ephesians 4:11-16

Article 6: Sexuality

We affirm the goodness of God’s design for human sexuality which prescribes the sexual union to be an exclusive relationship between a man and a woman in the lifelong covenant of marriage.

We deny that the pursuit of sexual pleasure is a justification for the development or use of AI, and we condemn the objectification of humans that results from employing AI for sexual purposes. AI should not intrude upon or substitute for the biblical expression of sexuality between a husband and wife according to God’s design for human marriage.

Genesis 1:26-29; 2:18-25; Matthew 5:27-30; 1 Thess 4:3-4

Article 5: Bias

We affirm that, as a tool created by humans, AI will be inherently subject to bias and that these biases must be accounted for, minimized, or removed through continual human oversight and discretion. AI should be designed and used in such ways that treat all human beings as having equal worth and dignity. AI should be utilized as a tool to identify and eliminate bias inherent in human decision-making.

We deny that AI should be designed or used in ways that violate the fundamental principle of human dignity for all people. Neither should AI be used in ways that reinforce or further any ideology or agenda, seeking to subjugate human autonomy under the power of the state.

Micah 6:8; John 13:34; Galatians 3:28-29; 5:13-14; Philippians 2:3-4; Romans 12:10

Article 4: Medicine

We affirm that AI-related advances in medical technologies are expressions of God’s common grace through and for people created in His image and that these advances will increase our capacity to provide enhanced medical diagnostics and therapeutic interventions as we seek to care for all people. These advances should be guided by basic principles of medical ethics, including beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice, which are all consistent with the biblical principle of loving our neighbor.

We deny that death and disease—effects of the Fall—can ultimately be eradicated apart from Jesus Christ. Utilitarian applications regarding healthcare distribution should not override the dignity of human life. Fur- 3 thermore, we reject the materialist and consequentialist worldview that understands medical applications of AI as a means of improving, changing, or completing human beings.

Matthew 5:45; John 11:25-26; 1 Corinthians 15:55-57; Galatians 6:2; Philippians 2:4

Article 3: Relationship of AI & Humanity

We affirm the use of AI to inform and aid human reasoning and moral decision-making because it is a tool that excels at processing data and making determinations, which often mimics or exceeds human ability. While AI excels in data-based computation, technology is incapable of possessing the capacity for moral agency or responsibility.

We deny that humans can or should cede our moral accountability or responsibilities to any form of AI that will ever be created. Only humanity will be judged by God on the basis of our actions and that of the tools we create. While technology can be created with a moral use in view, it is not a moral agent. Humans alone bear the responsibility for moral decision making.

Romans 2:6-8; Galatians 5:19-21; 2 Peter 1:5-8; 1 John 2:1

Article 2: AI as Technology

We affirm that the development of AI is a demonstration of the unique creative abilities of human beings. When AI is employed in accordance with God’s moral will, it is an example of man’s obedience to the divine command to steward creation and to honor Him. We believe in innovation for the glory of God, the sake of human flourishing, and the love of neighbor. While we acknowledge the reality of the Fall and its consequences on human nature and human innovation, technology can be used in society to uphold human dignity. As a part of our God-given creative nature, human beings should develop and harness technology in ways that lead to greater flourishing and the alleviation of human suffering.

We deny that the use of AI is morally neutral. It is not worthy of man’s hope, worship, or love. Since the Lord Jesus alone can atone for sin and reconcile humanity to its Creator, technology such as AI cannot fulfill humanity’s ultimate needs. We further deny the goodness and benefit of any application of AI that devalues or degrades the dignity and worth of another human being. 

Genesis 2:25; Exodus 20:3; 31:1-11; Proverbs 16:4; Matthew 22:37-40; Romans 3:23

Article 1: Image of God

We affirm that God created each human being in His image with intrinsic and equal worth, dignity, and moral agency, distinct from all creation, and that humanity’s creativity is intended to reflect God’s creative pattern.

We deny that any part of creation, including any form of technology, should ever be used to usurp or subvert the dominion and stewardship which has been entrusted solely to humanity by God; nor should technology be assigned a level of human identity, worth, dignity, or moral agency.

Genesis 1:26-28; 5:1-2; Isaiah 43:6-7; Jeremiah 1:5; John 13:34; Colossians 1:16; 3:10; Ephesians 4:24