Explainer  Human Dignity  Life  Marriage and Family  Religious Liberty  Appropriations  Public Policy

Explainer: Congress passes FY24 government funding legislation

Nearly six months after the beginning of fiscal year 2024, the U.S. Congress has finally fully funded the federal government through Sept. 30. Following four continuing resolutions (CRs), Congress passed two minibus packages that included all twelve federal appropriations bills that fund the various parts of the government. 

The first minibus, passed on March 8, included: 

  • the Agriculture-FDA; 
  • Commerce-Justice- Science;
  • Energy-Water; 
  • Interior-Environment; 
  • Military Construction-Veterans Affairs; 
  • and Transportation-Housing-Urban Development bills. 

The second minibus, passed on March 22, included the more controversial:

  • Defense;
  • Financial Services-General Government;
  • Homeland Security
  • Labor-Health and Human Services-Education;
  • Legislative Branch;
  • and State-Foreign Operations bills. 

Though the minibus packages advanced with large majorities, both packages garnered significant pushback from many members of Congress.

Each year, the ERLC communicates its concerns and priorities, particularly related to life and religious liberty, in appropriations with lawmakers. Though we were pleased to see some of our previously voiced concerns resolved in the final package, the realities of a divided Congress prevented many of our priorities and concerns from being addressed.

What was included in the bill?

Most significantly, the final spending package once again included the long-standing “Hyde-family” of riders. After several years of Democratic-led opposition to these riders, their continued presence is significant. This includes:

  • The Hyde amendment, which prevents Medicaid from covering the cost of abortion and protecting the consciences of American taxpayers. It saves an estimated 60,000 preborn lives each year.
  • The Weldon amendment, which protects the rights of conscience for healthcare professionals and institutions by preventing HHS from denying funding to recipients that refuse to provide, pay for, or refer for abortion.
  • The Helms amendment, which prevents foreign aid from directly paying for an abortion.
  • The Smith amendment, which bans funding for elective abortion through the Federal Employee Health Benefits program.
  • The Dornan amendment, which prohibits federal and congressionally approved local funds from paying for elective abortions in the District of Columbia.

Regrettably, alongside these riders, the final packages also included: 

  • significant funding for domestic family planning programs, 
  • veteran “gender specific care” programs, 
  • and similar international funds like the United Nations Population Fund which funnel money into pro-abortion organizations. 

Though these riders keep money from funding the actual abortion procedure, these organizations can use government funding to cover all other operational costs. While we would like to see no funding go toward the predatory abortion industry, it is noteworthy that the final funding levels were lower than originally proposed. Enacted FY23 levels were generally maintained.

Two small but significant victories for international religious freedom include: 

  • A funding increase for the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF). USCIRF plays a vital role in spotlighting and advocating for international religious freedom around the world. Though it was not fully funded at the requested amount, it did garner a significant increase in funding above FY23 levels. 
  • The inclusion of the longstanding, bipartisan Lautenberg Amendment. For decades, this rider has granted a special pathway to those fleeing religious persecution in former Soviet Union countries and Iran, including many evangelical Christians. Despite this history, the rider was initially excluded from the House State-Foreign Operations bill. The ERLC was encouraged to see this important language reinstated in the final package after much advocacy.

What was excluded from the bill?

The previously-introduced, Republican-led appropriations bills in the House of Representatives included many new provisions that would have pushed forward the cause of life and provided new protections for religious liberty and conscience rights. Unfortunately, nearly all of these “poison-pill”-deemed riders were stripped from the final package.

Many of the House-led bills included new riders that would have extended the “Hyde” protections that prohibit the use of government funding for abortion procedures to abortion-related travel. In the wake of the Dobbs decision, the Biden administration has taken a number of actions to circumvent Hyde restrictions on government funding. These riders would have provided important new protections to stop the Biden administration’s misuse of federal funds for the evil of abortion.

Similarly, many of the House-passed bills included new riders that would have mirrored Hyde-like protections to prohibit the use of government funding for “gender transition” procedures. The Biden administration has utilized every tool available to expand the availability and accessibility of these harmful procedures. These riders would have provided meaningful safeguards against the use of federal funds for these ends.

The ERLC will continue to advocate for these issues to be addressed through standalone legislation or in upcoming appropriations cycles.

What happens next?

Due to the late passage of these bills, the fiscal year 2025 appropriations cycle is already underway. President Biden has already submitted his symbolic budget request to Congress, and various cabinet secretaries are appearing before Congress to present their budget requests. 

As a nation, our values and priorities are most clearly displayed through the allocation of our resources. It is our desire for those resources to be used in a way that promotes life, religious liberty, and the flourishing of all our neighbors. As this process moves forward, the ERLC will continue to analyze these proposed bills and advocate for the inclusion of provisions that uphold these core principles.



Related Policies
and
Supreme Court Cases

Protect and Expand Pro-life Riders in the Congressional Appropriations Process

The ERLC believes pro-life riders are essential in protecting life as well as the consciences of millions of American taxpayers.

Southern Baptists affirm that every life is worthy of protection, beginning with the preborn....

Read More
Protect and Expand the Hyde Amendment

The ERLC works to expand Hyde protections to apply to all abortion-related funding in every appropriations bill passed by Congress.

Southern Baptists affirm that every life is worthy of protection, beginning with the preborn....

Read More
Support Federal Abortion Restrictions

As it has for decades, the ERLC continues to advocate for the complete end of abortion while supporting federal abortion restrictions.

Southern Baptists affirm every life is worthy of protection and is created in the...

Read More
Support No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act

The ERLC supports the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act because it is a significant step toward respecting human life and the right of conscience.

Southern Baptists believe every life is made in the image of God and is...

Read More

Related Content

Why we celebrate religious liberty on America’s 250th

Situated in Washington, D.C., the ERLC’s policy team is sharing in the excitement of...

Read More
Supreme Court decision in women's sports

Explainer: Supreme Court protects women and girls in women’s sports cases

In a monumental combined decision, the Supreme Court ruled that Idaho and West Virginia’s...

Read More
key themes from One Nation Under God

Six key themes from One Nation Under God

2026 SBC annual meeting reflections

On July 4, 1776, the Second Continental Congress formally adopted the Declaration of Independence....

Read More
Dobbs and pro-life advocacy

Why we still need pro-life advocacy 4 years after Dobbs 

On this day four years ago, the Supreme Court of the United States overturned...

Read More
landor

Explainer: Supreme Court denies monetary damages for prisoners when religious liberty rights are violated

The Supreme Court handed down its decision in Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections...

Read More
parental rights

How to exercise parental rights in a pro-LGBTQ culture

Equipping your children and engaging with your community

The world my kids are growing up and going to school in is completely...

Read More